�€�~�€���€@��€��€ ��€8��€��€��€��������������������噜��������?��������?��������~�������~����������€�����€�����€�����€@����������������?��?€?��€?��?��������������������������������?���?€��€����������������������������?�8��?€<�?��?€?��?€€�?€�€�?€�?€�?€�����?��?~��?~��?~��?€~��€��?�€�|?�€�~�€�>�€赌�?���?赌���赌����������������������������?����?��������������€���������赌��赌?赌��赌?���赌?���赌���赌����?�虫��虫��虫���虫���8��€8��<��<�€��€���������?��?�?���?������������€����€���€�?������������������?���?������€�������������€��€��?���������€���?���������������������?��€��€�����唼��������������������?�����€�€�������p
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
7099
endobj
22 0 obj
<<
/Length 23 0 R
>>
stream
Q
BT
277.08 318.24 TD
/F1 14.04 Tf
-0.009 Tc 0 Tw (Summary) Tj
-86.28 -32.4 TD -0.0144 Tc 0.0713 Tw (The four lower Snake River dams are) Tj
-2.88 -21 TD -0.0104 Tc 0.0673 Tw (not preventing the recovery of chinook) Tj
-1.08 -21 TD 0.0138 Tc 0.0431 Tw (salmon, according to results of a study) Tj
0.48 -21 TD 0.0031 Tc 0.0538 Tw (on the impact of dams on salmon pub-) Tj
5.88 -21 TD 0.0026 Tc 0.0543 Tw (lished in 2001 in the refereed journal) Tj
47.04 -21 TD /F3 14.04 Tf
0.0013 Tc 0.0555 Tw (Animal Conservation) Tj
129.6 0 TD /F1 14.04 Tf
0.0569 Tc 0 Tw (.) Tj
ET
177 168.72 1.08 169.56 re f
436.08 168.72 1.08 169.56 re f
177 337.2 260.04 1.08 re f
177 168.6 260.04 1.08 re f
172.56 164.16 2.76 178.56 re f
438.84 164.16 2.76 178.56 re f
172.56 339.96 269.04 2.76 re f
172.56 164.16 269.04 2.76 re f
BT
169.2 516.84 TD
/F0 20.04 Tf
-0.0071 Tc -0.0441 Tw (The Variable Impact of Dams) Tj
124.56 -27.96 TD -0.0044 Tc 0 Tw (on) Tj
-212.88 -27.96 TD -0.0138 Tc -0.0373 Tw (Columbia and Snake River Salmon Populations) Tj
218.88 -28.08 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.024 Tc 0 Tw (by) Tj
-97.08 -13.8 TD 0.0173 Tc 0.0067 Tw (Jay O\222Laughlin, Professor and Director) Tj
-35.28 -13.8 TD 0.0095 Tc 0.0145 Tw (College of Natural Resources Policy Analysis Group) Tj
63.48 -13.8 TD 0.015 Tc 0.009 Tw (妻友社区, Moscow) Tj
ET
72 643.68 468.12 1.68 re f
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
1392
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/Parent 5 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F0 6 0 R
/F1 8 0 R
/F2 12 0 R
/F3 20 0 R
>>
/XObject <<
/im1 14 0 R
/im2 16 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 2 0 R
>>
/Contents [ 10 0 R 18 0 R 22 0 R ]
>>
endobj
25 0 obj
<<
/Length 26 0 R
>>
stream
BT
295.32 45.84 TD
0 0 0 rg
/F1 12 Tf
0.032 Tc -0.008 Tw (- 2 -) Tj
-223.32 655.08 TD /F0 20.04 Tf
-0.0044 Tc 0 Tw (F) Tj
12.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.0192 Tc 0.0048 Tw (isheries scientists working in Idaho took a position in 1999 that a required action for) Tj
-12.24 -15.48 TD 0.0211 Tc 0.0029 Tw (recovering imperiled stocks of salmon and steelhead in Idaho is to restore the Columbia) Tj
0 -17.88 TD 0.0179 Tc 0.0061 Tw (and Snake Rivers to a free-flowing river system that is not impounded by dams. \(The) Tj
T* 0.018 Tc 0.006 Tw (position is still available today on the website of the Idaho Chapter, American Fisheries) Tj
T* 0.023 Tc 0.001 Tw (Society.\) The proposed means to this end in Idaho would be the \223breaching\224 or partial) Tj
T* 0.0211 Tc 0.0029 Tw (removal of the four lower Snake River dams in southeastern ) Tj
0.0581 Tc -0.0341 Tw (Washington. The clear) Tj
T* 0.02 Tc 0.004 Tw (logic of the breaching proposition is perhaps too simple, however, as there are other) Tj
T* 0.0237 Tc 0 Tw (factors affecting salmon populations, including not only habitat, harvest, hatcheries, and) Tj
T* 0.0276 Tc -0.0036 Tw (ocean conditions, but also the variable impact of dam design and operations on) Tj
T* 0.0326 Tc -0.0086 Tw (salmon. ) Tj
36 -35.76 TD 0.0257 Tc -0.0017 Tw (Fisheries scientists can contribute to the determination of dam impacts by) Tj
-36 -17.88 TD 0.0115 Tc 0.0125 Tw (providing sound ecological data based on well-constructed analyses. Reporting results) Tj
0 -17.88 TD 0.036 Tc -0.012 Tw (of recent research on the impact of dams on chinook salmon \() Tj
330.72 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
0.023 Tc 0 Tw (Oncorhynchus) Tj
-330.72 -18 TD 0.0336 Tc (tshawytcha) Tj
60.36 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.0135 Tc 0.0105 Tw (\) in the Columbia and Snake River systems, two fisheries scientists) Tj
-60.36 -18.12 TD 0.0142 Tc 0.0098 Tw (conclude unequivocally that the four lower Snake River dams are not preventing the) Tj
0 -17.88 TD 0.0125 Tc 0.0115 Tw (recovery of salmon in Idaho. However, dams may be a factor preventing recovery in the) Tj
T* 0.0209 Tc 0.0031 Tw (Upper Columbia River, upstream from the confluence with the Snake River in the) Tj
T* 0.0152 Tc 0.0088 Tw (vicinity of the Tri-Cities of Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland, ) Tj
0.0676 Tc -0.0436 Tw (Washington. ) Tj
36 -35.76 TD 0.0277 Tc -0.0037 Tw (The following abstract is from the article \223Differences in the impacts of dams on) Tj
-36 -17.88 TD 0.0191 Tc 0.0049 Tw (the dynamics of salmon populations\224 by Phillip S. Levin and Nicholas Tolimieri,) Tj
0 -17.88 TD 0.0277 Tc -0.0037 Tw (published in the refereed journal ) Tj
175.68 0 TD /F3 12 Tf
0.0087 Tc 0.0153 Tw (Animal Conservation) Tj
110.88 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.0229 Tc 0.0011 Tw ( \(2001, volume 4, issue 4,) Tj
-286.56 -18 TD 0.018 Tc 0.006 Tw (abstract online\):) Tj
36 -35.76 TD 0.0129 Tc 0.0111 Tw (Modern concrete dams have devastated fish populations world-wide. However,) Tj
0 -13.8 TD 0.0157 Tc 0.0083 Tw (dams vary greatly in how they are engineered and operated, and thus pose a) Tj
0 -14.16 TD 0.024 Tc -0 Tw (range of threats to riverine fauna. ) Tj
180.96 0 TD /F0 12 Tf
0.0075 Tc 0.0165 Tw (Understanding the differences in the) Tj
-180.96 -14.16 TD 0.0096 Tc 0.0144 Tw (impacts of dams is critical for setting conservation priorities.) Tj
348.84 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.1131 Tc -0.0891 Tw ( We used a) Tj
-348.84 -13.8 TD 0.0251 Tc -0.0011 Tw (modified BACI \(before-after-control-impact\) sampling design as a means to) Tj
0 -13.8 TD 0.0244 Tc -0 Tw (quantify the effects of dams on spring/summer chinook salmon in two) Tj
T* 0.0152 Tc 0.0088 Tw (watersheds \(Snake and Upper Columbia Rivers\) of the Columbia River Basin,) Tj
T* 0.0304 Tc -0.0064 Tw (USA. The construction of four dams in the Columbia River Basin from 1966 to) Tj
T* 0.0295 Tc -0.0055 Tw (1975 allowed us to test the hypothesis that the presence of these dams does not) Tj
T* 0.0274 Tc -0.0034 Tw (affect the abundance, survival and population growth of chinook salmon. In both) Tj
T* 0.0209 Tc 0.0031 Tw (the Snake and Upper Columbia Rivers, there was a significant decline from the) Tj
T* 0.0233 Tc 0 Tw (period before dams were constructed \(1959-65\) to the period after dams were) Tj
T* 0.0148 Tc 0.0092 Tw (constructed \(1980-90\). In the Upper Columbia River, declines in productivity or) Tj
T* 0.0222 Tc 0.0018 Tw (population performance \(measured as recruits per spawner or Ricker function) Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
26 0 obj
4544
endobj
24 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/Parent 5 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F0 6 0 R
/F1 8 0 R
/F3 20 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 2 0 R
>>
/Contents 25 0 R
>>
endobj
28 0 obj
<<
/Length 29 0 R
>>
stream
BT
295.32 45.84 TD
0 0 0 rg
/F1 12 Tf
0.032 Tc -0.008 Tw (- 3 -) Tj
-187.32 663 TD 0.0186 Tc 0.0054 Tw (residuals\) were greater than in the control region. On the other hand, patterns of) Tj
0 -13.8 TD 0.0146 Tc 0.0094 Tw (fish productivity in the Snake River were similar to those seen in the control) Tj
T* 0.023 Tc 0.001 Tw (region. The disparity between fates of Upper Columbia and Snake River) Tj
T* 0.0277 Tc -0.0037 Tw (populations points to the differences between regions in current efforts to reduce) Tj
0 -14.16 TD 0.0169 Tc 0.0071 Tw (fish mortality associated with dams. ) Tj
192.72 0 TD /F0 12 Tf
0.0041 Tc 0.0199 Tw (Our analysis suggests that dams in the) Tj
-192.72 -14.16 TD 0 Tc 0.024 Tw (Upper Columbia River, but not Snake River, are a potential force preventing) Tj
0 -14.16 TD -0.0029 Tc 0.0269 Tw (recovery of endangered salmon populations) Tj
252.72 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.0222 Tc 0.0018 Tw ( \(Levin & Tolimieri 2001, bold-) Tj
-252.72 -13.8 TD 0.0398 Tc -0.0158 Tw (face added for emphasis\).) Tj
0 -27.6 TD 0.0185 Tc 0.0055 Tw (The disparity of results in fish productivity between the Upper Columbia and) Tj
-36 -17.88 TD 0.0195 Tc 0.0045 Tw (Snake Rivers sections arises from differences in efforts to reduce juvenile mortality.) Tj
0 -17.88 TD 0.021 Tc 0.003 Tw (The Snake River dams have been equipped with elaborate structures to facilitate) Tj
T* 0.0197 Tc 0.0043 Tw (passage of juvenile migrants, the Upper Columbia dams have not. A large portion) Tj
T* 0.0217 Tc 0.0023 Tw (\(75%\) of the Snake River juveniles are collected and transported past the dams,) Tj
T* 0.0191 Tc 0.0049 Tw (whereas only a small portion of the Upper Columbia juveniles have been transported,) Tj
T* 0.0213 Tc 0.0027 Tw (and those that have encountered several dams without fish bypass facilities. ) Tj
36 -35.76 TD 0.0345 Tc -0.0105 Tw (What inferences can be drawn from this study about the breaching of the lower) Tj
-36 -17.88 TD 0.021 Tc 0.003 Tw (Snake River dams? Here\222s what the authors of the refereed journal article said:) Tj
36 -35.76 TD 0.0209 Tc 0.0031 Tw (Dams have clearly disrupted populations of salmon and other migratory fishes. In) Tj
0 -13.8 TD 0.0131 Tc 0.0109 Tw (the Columbia River Basin ... these dams obviously vary in the extent of their) Tj
0 -14.16 TD 0.0276 Tc -0.0036 Tw (impact. ... ) Tj
55.68 0 TD /F0 12 Tf
0.0028 Tc 0.0212 Tw (While it is difficult to demonstrate clearly the magnitude of the) Tj
-55.68 -14.16 TD 0.0128 Tc 0.0112 Tw (impact of dams, our results indicate that the effects of dams will vary) Tj
0 -14.16 TD 0.0063 Tc 0.0177 Tw (depending on how they are constructed and operated.) Tj
309.84 0 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.018 Tc 0.006 Tw ( There is plainly much) Tj
-309.84 -13.8 TD 0.0288 Tc -0.0048 Tw (scope for both scientific and policy debates concerning the impact of dams on) Tj
0 -13.8 TD 0.0193 Tc 0.0047 Tw (the recovery of these salmon populations. Ideally, fisheries scientists can) Tj
T* 0.0236 Tc 0 Tw (contribute to the determination of dam impacts by providing sound ecological) Tj
0 -14.16 TD 0.0167 Tc 0.0073 Tw (data based on well-constructed analyses. ) Tj
224.16 0 TD /F0 12 Tf
-0.005 Tc 0.029 Tw (Our analysis points to hydropower) Tj
-224.16 -14.16 TD -0.0024 Tc 0.0264 Tw (systems on the Upper Columbia River, but not the Snake River, as a) Tj
0 -14.16 TD -0.0026 Tc 0.0266 Tw (potential force preventing recovery of endangered salmon populations) Tj
0 -13.8 TD /F1 12 Tf
0.0278 Tc -0.0037 Tw (\(Levin & Tolimieri 2001, bold-face added for emphasis\). ) Tj
0 -27.6 TD 0.0328 Tc -0.0088 Tw (The inference for policymakers seems clear enough. Because of efforts taken to) Tj
-36 -17.88 TD 0.0134 Tc 0.0106 Tw (bypass juvenile salmon migrants around the four lower Snake River dams in) Tj
0 -17.88 TD 0.029 Tc -0.005 Tw (southeastern ) Tj
0.0216 Tc 0.0024 Tw (Washington, the dams are not currently preventing the recovery of) Tj
T* 0.0334 Tc -0.0094 Tw (threatened Snake River chinook salmon populations. The same cannot be said of dams) Tj
T* 0.0329 Tc -0.0089 Tw (on the Upper Columbia River, upstream from the confluence of the Snake and) Tj
T* 0.015 Tc 0.009 Tw (Columbia Rivers, where dams are a potential force preventing recovery of endangered) Tj
T* 0.0262 Tc -0.0022 Tw (Upper Columbia chinook salmon populations.) Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
29 0 obj
4425
endobj
27 0 obj
<<
/Type /Page
/Parent 5 0 R
/Resources <<
/Font <<
/F0 6 0 R
/F1 8 0 R
>>
/ProcSet 2 0 R
>>
/Contents 28 0 R
>>
endobj
6 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/Name /F0
/BaseFont /Arial,Bold
/FirstChar 31
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 750 278 333 474 556 556 889 722 238 333 333 389 584 278 333 278
278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 333 333 584 584 584
611 975 722 722 722 722 667 611 778 722 278 556 722 611 833 722
778 667 778 722 667 611 722 667 944 667 667 611 333 278 333 584
556 333 556 611 556 611 556 333 611 611 278 278 556 278 889 611
611 611 611 389 556 333 611 556 778 556 556 500 389 280 389 584
750 556 750 278 556 500 1000 556 556 333 1000 667 333 1000 750 750
750 750 278 278 500 500 350 556 1000 333 1000 556 333 944 750 750
667 278 333 556 556 556 556 280 556 333 737 370 556 584 333 737
552 400 549 333 333 333 576 556 278 333 333 365 556 834 834 834
611 722 722 722 722 722 722 1000 722 667 667 667 667 278 278 278
278 722 722 778 778 778 778 778 584 778 722 722 722 722 667 667
611 556 556 556 556 556 556 889 556 556 556 556 556 278 278 278
278 611 611 611 611 611 611 611 549 611 611 611 611 611 556 611
556 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/FontDescriptor 7 0 R
>>
endobj
7 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Arial,Bold
/Flags 16416
/FontBBox [ -250 -220 1236 930 ]
/MissingWidth 750
/StemV 153
/StemH 153
/ItalicAngle 0
/CapHeight 930
/XHeight 651
/Ascent 930
/Descent -220
/Leading 180
/MaxWidth 1030
/AvgWidth 480
>>
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/Name /F1
/BaseFont /Arial
/FirstChar 31
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 750 278 278 355 556 556 889 667 191 333 333 389 584 278 333 278
278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 278 278 584 584 584
556 1015 667 667 722 722 667 611 778 722 278 500 667 556 833 722
778 667 778 722 667 611 722 667 944 667 667 611 278 278 278 469
556 333 556 556 500 556 556 278 556 556 222 222 500 222 833 556
556 556 556 333 500 278 556 500 722 500 500 500 334 260 334 584
750 556 750 222 556 333 1000 556 556 333 1000 667 333 1000 750 750
750 750 222 222 333 333 350 556 1000 333 1000 500 333 944 750 750
667 278 333 556 556 556 556 260 556 333 737 370 556 584 333 737
552 400 549 333 333 333 576 537 278 333 333 365 556 834 834 834
611 667 667 667 667 667 667 1000 722 667 667 667 667 278 278 278
278 722 722 778 778 778 778 778 584 778 722 722 722 722 667 667
611 556 556 556 556 556 556 889 500 556 556 556 556 278 278 278
278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 549 611 556 556 556 556 500 556
500 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/FontDescriptor 9 0 R
>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Arial
/Flags 32
/FontBBox [ -250 -217 1213 902 ]
/MissingWidth 750
/StemV 81
/StemH 81
/ItalicAngle 0
/CapHeight 902
/XHeight 631
/Ascent 902
/Descent -217
/Leading 153
/MaxWidth 1011
/AvgWidth 446
>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/Name /F2
/BaseFont /TimesNewRoman
/FirstChar 31
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 778 250 333 408 500 500 833 778 180 333 333 500 564 250 333 250
278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 278 278 564 564 564
444 921 722 667 667 722 611 556 722 722 333 389 722 611 889 722
722 556 722 667 556 611 722 722 944 722 722 611 333 278 333 469
500 333 444 500 444 500 444 333 500 500 278 278 500 278 778 500
500 500 500 333 389 278 500 500 722 500 500 444 480 200 480 541
778 500 778 333 500 444 1000 500 500 333 1000 556 333 889 778 778
778 778 333 333 444 444 350 500 1000 333 980 389 333 722 778 778
722 250 333 500 500 500 500 200 500 333 760 276 500 564 333 760
500 400 549 300 300 333 576 453 250 333 300 310 500 750 750 750
444 722 722 722 722 722 722 889 667 611 611 611 611 333 333 333
333 722 722 722 722 722 722 722 564 722 722 722 722 722 722 556
500 444 444 444 444 444 444 667 444 444 444 444 444 278 278 278
278 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 549 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
500 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/FontDescriptor 13 0 R
>>
endobj
13 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /TimesNewRoman
/Flags 34
/FontBBox [ -250 -241 1200 895 ]
/MissingWidth 774
/StemV 73
/StemH 73
/ItalicAngle 0
/CapHeight 895
/XHeight 626
/Ascent 895
/Descent -241
/Leading 180
/MaxWidth 1000
/AvgWidth 398
>>
endobj
20 0 obj
<<
/Type /Font
/Subtype /TrueType
/Name /F3
/BaseFont /Arial,Italic
/FirstChar 31
/LastChar 255
/Widths [ 750 278 278 355 556 556 889 667 191 333 333 389 584 278 333 278
278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 278 278 584 584 584
556 1015 667 667 722 722 667 611 778 722 278 500 667 556 833 722
778 667 778 722 667 611 722 667 944 667 667 611 278 278 278 469
556 333 556 556 500 556 556 278 556 556 222 222 500 222 833 556
556 556 556 333 500 278 556 500 722 500 500 500 334 260 334 584
750 556 750 222 556 333 1000 556 556 333 1000 667 333 1000 750 750
750 750 222 222 333 333 350 556 1000 333 1000 500 333 944 750 750
667 278 333 556 556 556 556 260 556 333 737 370 556 584 333 737
552 400 549 333 333 333 576 537 278 333 333 365 556 834 834 834
611 667 667 667 667 667 667 1000 722 667 667 667 667 278 278 278
278 722 722 778 778 778 778 778 584 778 722 722 722 722 667 667
611 556 556 556 556 556 556 889 500 556 556 556 556 278 278 278
278 556 556 556 556 556 556 556 549 611 556 556 556 556 500 556
500 ]
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/FontDescriptor 21 0 R
>>
endobj
21 0 obj
<<
/Type /FontDescriptor
/FontName /Arial,Italic
/Flags 96
/FontBBox [ -250 -214 1220 897 ]
/MissingWidth 752
/StemV 81
/StemH 81
/ItalicAngle -11
/CapHeight 897
/XHeight 627
/Ascent 897
/Descent -214
/Leading 145
/MaxWidth 1017
/AvgWidth 444
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
[ /PDF /Text /ImageB ]
endobj
5 0 obj
<<
/Kids [4 0 R 24 0 R 27 0 R ]
/Count 3
/Type /Pages
/MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ]
>>
endobj
1 0 obj
<<
/Creator